top of page
Search

Alabama Product Liability and the AEMLD: A Practical Guide

Writer: Elliott Lipinsky
Elliott Lipinsky
Jul 20
3 min read

Updated: Sep 11

A product injury is not automatically a product-liability case. The product, alleged defect, chain of distribution, warnings, manner of use, causation, defenses, and resulting harm all require investigation.

The Law Offices of Elliott Owen Lipinsky is a solo law practice based in Selma. Elliott evaluates product-related injury matters in West Alabama and the River Region. This guide explains general Alabama principles; it does not predict liability, settlement value, or a result.

What is the AEMLD?

The Alabama Extended Manufacturer’s Liability Doctrine, commonly called the AEMLD, is a judicially developed doctrine associated with Casrell v. Altec Industries, Inc. and Atkins v. American Motors Corp. A claimant must do more than show that an accident involved a product. The proof generally concerns whether the defendant sold a product in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the user or consumer, whether it reached the user without substantial change in that condition, and whether the condition caused the injury.

Claims are often described as involving a manufacturing defect, a design defect, or inadequate warnings, but each theory has its own proof. Alabama design-defect decisions require analysis of a safer, practical alternative design and the relative risks and utility; a later accident or a different available product is not enough by itself.

Not every seller is liable

Ala. Code § 6-5-521 defines a product-liability action and limits claims against a distributor, wholesaler, dealer, retailer, or seller that is merely a conduit of the product. The statute also identifies circumstances in which a claim against a seller may proceed. The identity and conduct of each business in the distribution chain should therefore be investigated before naming parties or making public accusations.

Warranty and negligence theories may also matter

Depending on the transaction and injury, a case may involve negligence or warranty law in addition to, or instead of, the AEMLD. Ala. Code § 7-2-314 addresses the implied warranty of merchantability. Ala. Code § 7-2-318 addresses certain people who may benefit from seller warranties. Contract terms, notice questions, product use, and the nature of the damages can affect the analysis. A related guide explains how these principles may apply to a dangerous object or contaminant in food.

Preserve the product before it changes

  • Keep the product, components, packaging, instructions, warnings, receipts, model and serial numbers, and proof of purchase.

  • Do not repair, test, disassemble, alter, return, or discard the product without advice.

  • Photograph the product, scene, damage, and identifying labels.

  • Save recall notices, manuals, advertisements, communications, and medical records.

  • Identify witnesses and every person or business that handled the product after the event.

Product cases often depend on inspection and qualified technical analysis. Lost or altered evidence can affect what can be proven. Ala. Code § 6-2-38 supplies a two-year period for many personal-injury claims, but warranty, wrongful-death, governmental, and other claims may involve different rules. Prompt review is important.

Discuss a product-related injury

If a product may have injured you or a family member in Selma or West Alabama, you may contact the Law Offices of Elliott Owen Lipinsky to request an initial consultation. Whether the firm can help depends on the facts, evidence, parties, law, and available resources. Contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship; the firm will confirm in writing if it accepts the representation.

Primary Alabama authorities

Comments

bottom of page